|



| |
|
Date of scheduled execution |
State |
Victim name |
Inmate name |
Status |
|
December 3, 2008 |
Washington |
Denise Stenson
Frank Hoerner |
Darold Stenson |
pending |
|
On March 25, 1993, at
4:00 a.m. Stenson called 911 and told the operator “this is D.J.
Stenson at Dakota Farms . . . . Frank has just shot my wife, and
himself, I think.” Dakota Farms was located in Clallam County,
Washington and was the residence of Stenson, his wife, Denise
Stenson, and their three young children. Stenson also operated a
business, raising and selling exotic birds, from Dakota Farms.
Within several minutes of Stenson’s 911 call, the police arrived at
Dakota Farms. Stenson met them outside and led them to a guest
bedroom on the ground floor, where Frank Hoerner lay dead on the
floor with a bullet wound to the head. The body was face-down. A
revolver lay between Hoerner’s left hand and his head. Stenson next
led the police officers to an upstairs bedroom where Denise Stenson
lay in the bed, with a severe bullet wound to the head. She was
airlifted to a hospital, but died the next day. Stenson told the
officers the following story: Frank Hoerner had arrived at his house
a little after 3:30 a.m. in order to sign forms to insure ostriches
that Stenson was going to buy for Hoerner on a trip to Texas. When
Hoerner arrived, the two men went to Stenson’s office in a separate
building behind the house, where Hoerner signed the insurance forms.
Hoerner
then left the office building to use the bathroom in the house. When
Hoerner failed to return, Stenson went to look for him and found him
dead in the guest bedroom, where Stenson had shown police the body.
Stenson heard moaning from upstairs. When he went upstairs, he found
his wife shot in the head. Stenson had not heard any gun shots.
Stenson then called the 911 operator. When the officers asked
Stenson if he knew why someone would want to kill Frank Hoerner,
Stenson responded that there had been sexual problems between
Hoerner and his wife, Denise Hoerner, and that Frank Hoerner had
complained about their marriage. The subsequent investigation showed
that Frank Hoerner had not committed suicide in the bedroom, but had
been hit in the head and dragged into the house from the gravel
driveway, through the laundry room, and into the guest bedroom where
Stenson claimed to have found the body. Hoerner had been shot in the
head in the guest bedroom at close range. The revolver had been
placed near Hoerner’s hand after his hand had come to rest on the
floor. Splatters of Hoerner’s blood were found in the driveway.
Blood splatters were also found on Stenson’s pants that matched
Hoerner’s blood protein profile. Gravel from the driveway was found
in the laundry room and inside Hoerner’s pants. A bloody Stenson
fingerprint was found on the freezer in the laundry room. According
to Michael Grubb, a forensic expert, the pattern of some of the
splatters indicated that they could not have been deposited on
Stenson’s pants after Frank had been moved, i.e., the splatters on
Stenson’s pants strongly suggested that Stenson had moved Frank’s
body after he was shot. The police also found ammunition in
Stenson’s garage that fit the murder weapon. They found gunshot
residue inside a
pocket of Stenson’s pants. Stenson had once been a martial arts
instructor, and had a collection of nun-chucka sticks on the wall of
his office. Dr. Brady, who performed the autopsy on Frank Hoerner,
testified at the trial that the wounds on Hoerner’s head were
consistent with such a weapon. The investigation also revealed that
Stenson was in financial difficulty. Frank Hoerner had given Stenson
a $50,000 deposit for the purchase of exotic birds, but at the time
of the murders Stenson’s financial records showed that he had used
less than $2,000 of Hoerner’s deposit to purchase birds. In
addition, the bank account for Dakota Farms contained only about
$3,400, and an audit indicated that Stenson had used investors’
money for personal purchases. He had attempted to borrow a large
amount of money shortly before the murders. Finally, Stenson had
taken out a $400,000 life insurance policy on his wife. Stenson was
arrested on April 8, 1993, about two weeks after the murders. His
jury trial took place in Clallam County, Washington, in the summer
of 1994. The prosecution’s theory was that Stenson had killed his
wife in order to collect the $400,000 in life insurance money, and
had killed Frank Hoerner in order to free himself from the $48,000
he owed Hoerner and to be able to blame Hoerner for the murder of
Denise Stenson. The prosecutor argued to the jury that the physical
evidence taken at the crime scene made Stenson’s initial statements
to the police implausible. Frank Hoerner’s wife, Denise Hoerner,
testified that Stenson solicited Hoerner for investments in
Stenson’s exotic bird business. Since 1992, Hoerner had given
Stenson more than $50,000 for the purchase of birds. About a month
before the murders, Hoerner became worried about the money he had
entrusted to Stenson and so told Stenson either to return his
investment or to deliver the promised birds. In response, Stenson
told the Hoerners that he needed to keep their money in his account
in order to maintain the confidence of Asian investors from whom he
was attempting to obtain a loan. Denise Hoerner further testified
that her husband’s anxiety continued when Stenson traveled to Texas
to obtain birds for the Hoerners, but returned empty-handed. She
testified that Stenson assured Hoerner that he would return to Texas
on March 25, 1993, to collect the birds. On the evening of March 24,
Stenson told Hoerner to come to his house to sign documents
necessary to insure the birds during their trip from Texas. Denise
Hoerner offered to come sign the papers, but Stenson said that only
Hoerner could sign them. Hoerner agreed to come by Stenson’s house
during the early morning hours of March 25, on his way to the ferry
that he took to work in Seattle. During the course of the trial,
Stenson and his attorney, Fred Leatherman, developed conflicting
views as to whether Leatherman should attempt to convince the jury
that Denise Hoerner was the murderer. Leatherman did not want to
attempt this defense because the forensic expert had concluded that
Stenson could not have gotten the blood splatters on his pants after
discovering Frank Hoerner’s body. In the context of the other
evidence, this conclusion strongly suggested that Stenson had moved
Hoerner’s body after Hoerner had been killed, which in turn strongly
suggested that Stenson killed Hoerner. Leatherman believed that
attempting to vilify Denise Hoerner would only turn the jury against
Stenson and increase the likelihood that it would impose the death
penalty during the sentencing phase. As a result of the conflict
regarding trial strategy, Stenson moved the court to appoint new
counsel or, in the alternative, to allow him to represent himself.
Because Stenson’s request came three weeks into the voir dire
process and near the end of jury selection, the trial court
determined that Stenson’s request to represent himself was untimely.
It also found that Stenson’s request was equivocal, based on the
record as a whole. The court based this determination on the fact
that Stenson indicated that he “really [did] not want to proceed
without counsel[,]” and made his request to represent himself only
as an alternative, should the trial court refuse to appoint new
counsel. The trial court did not appoint independent counsel to
represent Stenson at the hearing on the motion for new counsel. On
August 11, 1994, the jury convicted Stenson of two counts of
aggravated first-degree murder. With regard to the murder of Denise
Stenson, the jury found the aggravating circumstances that more than
one person was murdered and that the murders were part of a common
scheme or plan. With regard to the murder of Frank Hoerner, the jury
found the aggravating circumstances that the murder was committed to
conceal a crime or to protect or conceal the defendant’s identity,
and that more than one person was murdered as part of a common
scheme or plan. During the penalty phase, Leatherman stated that
both he and Stenson “accepted” the jury’s determination of guilt.
Leatherman also requested that the court hear testimony from
Stenson’s family members regarding the impact Stenson’s execution
would have on Stenson’s three young children and his father, who
suffered from a heart condition. The court permitted extensive
testimony from Stenson’s family and friends regarding their
relationships with him, but excluded testimony from Stenson’s family
members regarding how his execution would impact them, because the
court found that this testimony would do no more than present their
opinions as to what Stenson’s sentence should be. The jury sentenced
Stenson to death. |
|
Date of scheduled execution |
State |
Victim name |
Inmate name |
Status |
|
December 8, 2008 |
Louisiana |
Ronald Williams
Ha Vu
Cuong Vu |
Antoinette Frank |
pending |
|
On March 4, 1995,
Antoinette Frank, then an officer with the New Orleans Police
Department, and Rogers Lacaze were arrested and charged with three
counts of first degree murder for the deaths of Ronald Williams, Ha
Vu, and Cuong Vu. The murders occurred in the early morning hours at
the Kim Anh Restaurant in New Orleans East. The Vu family owned the
restaurant, and Ronald Williams was an off-duty police officer
performing security detail that evening at the restaurant. Frank had
occasionally worked at the restaurant as a security guard and was
familiar with the Vu family and Ronald Williams. She and Lacaze
visited the restaurant several times on the night of the murders. As
the restaurant was closing early that morning, Chau Vu, sister of
two of the victims, went into the kitchen to count money. She
reentered the dining room of the restaurant to pay Ronald Williams,
when she noticed Frank approaching the restaurant yet again. Sensing
something was wrong, Chau Vu ran back to the kitchen and hid the
money in the microwave before returning to the front of the
restaurant. Using a stolen key, Frank entered the restaurant and
began to walk quickly to the back of the building, pushing Chau, one
of Chau’s brothers, Quoc, and a restaurant employee along with her.
Shots rang out, and Frank ran back to the front of the restaurant.
Chau, Quoc, and the employee hid in a cooler in the kitchen,
concerned because they did not know the whereabouts of Chau’s and
Quoc’s sister and brother, Ha and Cuong. From inside the cooler,
Chau and Quoc could partially see the front of the restaurant. Chau
initially could see Frank, who appeared to be looking for something.
Frank moved out of Chau’s line of vision, and then the three hiding
heard additional gunshots. Quoc next observed Frank searching in the
area where the Vus usually kept their money. He then saw her walk
over to the area where he later found the bodies of his brother and
sister, and he heard more gunshots. After Frank and Rogers Lacaze
left the premises, Quoc emerged from the cooler and called 911 to
report the murders. After police officers arrived on the scene,
Frank returned to the restaurant as well. She approached Chau,
asking her what happened. Chau found another officer and reported
what she had witnessed. After Chau was interviewed in more detail,
Antoinette Frank and Rogers Lacaze were arrested and charged with
first degree murder. Frank and Lacaze were indicted by an Orleans
Parish Grand Jury on April 28, 1995. Their trials were severed, and
Rogers Lacaze was tried first on July 17-21, 1995, found guilty as
charged, and sentenced to death. Frank’s trial began on September 5,
1995, and on September 12, 1995, the jury returned a guilty verdict
on all counts and recommended a sentence of death as to all counts.
Frank was formally sentenced to death on October 20, 1995. |
Page visited
times since 10/5/08
Page last updated
11/18/08 |